Pride and Prejudice - The STORY GRID edition - Annotated by SHAWN COYNE

SEARCH

Search

SUBSCRIBE

Subscribe RSS

Subscribe to SPO.

ARCHIVES OF September, 2014

What It Takes

What It Takes

What the Dog Saw: Pitching and Receiving

By Callie Oettinger | Published: September 26, 2014

Personal Value: LEFT OF BANG and WHAT THE DOG SAW

I’ve been on the pitching and receiving end of books and films, as a publicist sharing information and as an editor and/or writer receiving and deciding what to do with that information.

Personal value is the common thread. As both a publicist and an editor/writer, you have to find the elements of value. What is of interest on the surface and what is of interest if you dive deeper—and how can they be pulled out?

A good example of this process resides in the following from Malcolm Gladwell, on how he finds a story:

You don’t start at the top if you want to find the story. You start in the middle, because it’s the people in the middle who do the actual work in the world.

If a book is a corporation/organization/you name it, what represents the “people in the middle” who drive the book? Find that and you’ll find the personal value that appeals to readers, editors/writers, and so on.
(more…)

Posted in What It Takes
11 Comments

Writing Wednesdays

Writing Wednesdays

Nobody Knows Nothing, Part Two

By Steven Pressfield | Published: September 24, 2014

We were talking last week about how hard it is to evaluate material, particularly your own.

Not even Quentin Tarantino knows everything.

How do you tell if your new novel, your start-up, your Cuban-Chinese restaurant is any good? Who can tell you? Whose judgment can you trust?

In the literary/movie field, entire industries have evolved to respond to this need. Robert McKee (full disclosure: my friend) has established himself, among others, as the guru of Story Structure. A vocabulary, from Bob and other analysts, has spread through every studio and production company. “Inciting Incident,” “Second Act Turning Point,” “All Is Lost moment” are phrases that every script reader and development exec knows by heart.

Why? Because they help bring order out of chaos. They shed light on the mysteries of story. Is this book/screenplay working? Why? If something’s wrong, what is it? And how do we fix it?

Story analysis is the industry’s attempt at a diagnostic instrument. Is it art? Is it science? Is it bullshit?

Should you, the writer, study this stuff? Should you craft your stories to suit the guidelines and principles of “story structure?” Will the exercise inhibit you? Will it make you self-conscious, over-analytical? Will it reduce your work to formula?

Should you remain ignorant?

Are you a genius?

Does your gift set you beyond the need to know the principles of your craft?

Here’s my answer in two questions:

1. Who has bent the rules more successfully over the past twenty years than Quentin Tatantino?

2. Who understands the rules better than Quentin Tarantino?

I’m a believer in knowing the rules. You have to be familiar with the vocabulary. You have to understand the conventions of the genre you’re working in, even if (particularly if) it’s a genre that you yourself have just invented.

And yet … (more…)

Posted in Writing Wednesdays
8 Comments

What It Takes

What It Takes

The Small Press Conundrum

By Shawn Coyne | Published: September 19, 2014

So despite your literary agent’s best efforts, your first novel/first nonfiction proposal didn’t sell to any of the Big Five publishers.

Bowker's 5400-page 2014 Guide to U.S. Publishers

What do you do now?

You ask your agent to plumb the directories of small presses and start cold calling.

Right?

Well, if your agent is a realist, that is if she has a family to support or she isn’t in the habit of taking money (her time) and throwing it out a window, she’ll beg off.

She’ll tell you that your time is better spent writing another book and trying your luck again with one of the majors in 9 to 12 months. To take whatever editorial advice you can glean from the pile of rejection letters she’s sent you and move on with your life.

But if you continue to insist she submit the book to Podunk Press, she will tactfully suggest that it would be best to part ways. Not because you are a terrible writer or a nasty person, but because she’s already blown a ton of time on you (that means money that she could have been earning with someone else) and she has no intention of throwing away more.

I own a literary agency, Genre Management Inc., and I represent a small list of writers myself. [FYI, I no longer take on any new clients. My plate is full! Please don’t ask me to read your book! Don’t be offended. I’m sure you’re great, but I have too much work as it is!]

Now, the first thing I used to tell potential clients is that I would do everything possible to get their book sold to a major publisher for the highest guaranteed advance possible. But if I didn’t sell it to a major publisher, it’s the end of the line for that project for me. I won’t submit the book to small publishers.

Why?

Hey, I was the publisher of a small press years ago and I never expected agents to submit to me. Instead I cooked up all of the book ideas myself, contacted the writers myself, and made the deals usually directly with the writers themselves. I didn’t sit around waiting for agents to send me stuff that the majors had already passed on…

If an agent represented a writer I wanted to work with, I wouldn’t discuss my book idea with him/her until we agreed on general financial terms. If we couldn’t agree, then I’d find another writer. The last thing I wanted (because it happened to me on more than one occasion before I wised up) was to give a writer and his agent a book idea without having their agreement to write it for me on my terms…signed, sealed and delivered. If I did give them the idea before the money was agreed to, they’d usually discover that what I was offering them to write it and what they would be able to find on the open market if they’d come up with the idea themselves were vastly different opportunities.

So what would happen is that they’d stall on deciding to do the book with me and send the idea that I gave them out to the major publishers. Then they’d come back to me with offers in hand that were often ten times the amount I could afford. Not cool, but that’s life baby!

Could I sue them and make their lives miserable for “stealing my idea?” Probably, but then I’d make myself miserable too. So after this happened to me (yes, it happened to me more than once…Duh!) I learned to get the money settled up front before pitching them my project.

But I digress.

Why again, do most agents not submit to small publishers? Here’s why:

The guaranteed advances from small publishers (if they offer any at all) are not anywhere near the level of the majors. What’s worse is that their royalty structures are often lower than the majors. So tiny guaranteed money up front, and less money on the back end.

Why would you do that deal unless you were convinced that the small publisher had magic dust that would guarantee that your book would break bestseller records?

Well, you’d do it for third party validation…  Proof that you were chosen as “worthy” to exploit and not having to tell your friends that no one wanted to publish your book. I get it. But you don’t have to do that anymore…you can bet on yourself and do a whole lot better.

Let’s look at it from the agent point of view.

The 15% commission for an agent on $1,000 advance is $150. That’s it. But the amount of work for a book that gets $1,000 advance is almost exactly the same as a book that receives a $100,000 advance of $1,000,000 advance. The agent still has to vet the contract. She still has to field all of your phone calls. She has to review the copy, the covers, the “marketing” plans etc.

If you were an agent would you rather handle one book that gets a $100,000 advance or one hundred books that get $1000 advances? You’d make the same money ($15,000) but you’d to do 100 times the work in small press land. Trust me. No one loves books enough to be paid $150 to do $15,000 worth of work.

Now a smaller publisher may have a book that becomes a huge bestseller, but in all likelihood, unless they came up with the idea themselves and commissioned the work, the publisher’s efforts will have little to do with the book’s success. (more…)

Posted in What It Takes
12 Comments
Sign up for first look access.

Enter your email to get free access to every new thing I do.

No spam, I promise!

Gates of Fire
The War of Art
The Knowledge
Nobody Wants to Read Your Sh*t
The Authentic Swing
The Lion's Gate
Turning Pro
The Profession
The Warrior Ethos
Do The Work
Tides of War
The Afghan Campaign
The Virtues of War
Killing Rommel
Last of the Amazons
The Legend of Bagger Vance
Additional Reading
Video Blog