By Shawn Coyne
Published: February 27, 2015
[Join www.storygrid.com to read more of Shawn’s Stuff]
Like you, every Wednesday morning, with my first cup of coffee in hand, I sit down and read Steve’s WRITING WEDNESDAY posts.
His recent series on “killer scenes” and the ways in which he constructs his work have been off the charts for me. Here’s what I love about them:
- They’re personal…Steve does not pretend to be speaking from Mount Olympus. He’s just giving us the straight dope about how he keeps his writing engines primed and working at peak efficiency. I was reminded of the importance of these idiosyncratic methodologies we all develop from Jeremy Anderberg’s Twitter post that linked to Hemingway’s interview in the Paris Review. If Papa was timid talking about his process, fearful that to talk about it is to dissipate its magic, you know this stuff ain’t for the faint hearted.
- They’re Meta-entertaining. I love reading about how people create things. What went through their minds. How they solve problems. It’s the classic “origin story” Subgenre of the Performance Genre. Which as you know has the core value of Honor/Shame. The trick is to honor your process, not to degrade or cheese it up for profit. You’ve got to be truthful. And yes, as Steve proves over and over again, you can write about writing with honor.
- They’re Inspiring. I’m an editor/Right Brain kind of writer. What that means is that I want to create a lot of little boxes or units of story, fill them up, polish them and then link them all together. I start from the structural point of view. That’s what makes me comfortable.
Reading about how Steve does it from the Left Side of the brain takes away a lot of the terror I’ve associated with the Muse. I’m the kind of person who thinks the Muse has no interest in me. I’m a blue-collar worker just banging out the word count and then getting out the sander after I’ve got some knotty pine to smooth.
It’s obvious that Steve does not do anything of the sort that I do. He does not construct his stories so much as he tunes in and listens to his inner word whisperer. He then pulls out the meaning of the messages that come to him from the great unknown.
Of course he’s a pro, though. He wears the same blue-collar I do.
He knows all of the stuff I know (more even) so he organizes the messages in a general/global structure that aligns perfectly with Story nerd systems like mine. He knows he needs inciting incidents, progressive complications, crises, climaxes and resolutions in every scene he writes etc., but instead of working to fill up boxes, he thinks about the whole trunk first.
I find his technique terrifying.
If I can’t label something and put it inside a methodology, I just as soon toss it in the trash can. But after having read Steve’s Killer Scenes series, I feel better. I’m more open to the quantum soup. I’m not so quick to toss out a phrase that somehow jumps into my brain. Now I’m putting them in little folders to marinate.
Which brings me to the title of this post…TOO OLD FOR HEROES.